Pleading and Cooperation in Private-Law Litigation

Comparing Germany and the United States

2025. 213 S.
Erhältlich als
79,90 €
ISBN 978-3-428-19263-2
sofort lieferbar
79,90 €
ISBN 978-3-428-59263-0
sofort lieferbar
Preis für Bibliotheken: 120,00 € [?]

Beschreibung

The book compares inter alia how civil courts in the United States and Germany balance the burdens on the plaintiff and defendant during the pleading and information-disclosure stages by focusing on pleading requirements, accommodations made to the plaintiff to account for information asymmetry and an examination of testimonial privileges. The initial pleading stage of a civil case addresses important threshold questions before the court proceeds to collecting and evaluating evidence. Access to evidence in the United States through discovery procedures is much broader than in Germany and the pleading standard in federal courts was modified due to criticism of costly and invasive discovery. But pleading that requires more than notice to the defendant imposes a higher burden on the plaintiff. The degree to which civil procedure demands cooperation from civil defendants in the form of document and testimonial disclosure likewise reflects broader value judgments about the appropriate burdens on the parties in litigation. Using the ideal types of legal formalism and legal realism, the author examines the jurisprudential underpinnings for differences between German and U.S. approaches to pleading and information-disclosure. The author concludes that important procedural principles and longstanding practices account for significant differences in pleading and cooperation rules; these rules favor defendants in Germany while generally tending to favor plaintiffs in the United States.

Inhaltsübersicht

I. The Significance of Civil Private Law Adjudication
Holmes and the Courts – The American Preference for Judges and Litigation

II. Attacking Formalism
Legal Realism and Related Theories – German Theories of Adjudication – German Legal Science and Methods – Legal Dogmatics and Foundational Research – The Influence of Critical Theories of Adjudication

III. Comparative Method
Why Compare? – What is Comparative Law?

IV. Private-Law Litigation – Values and Attitudes
Comparing the Parties’ Burdens – Civil Pleading Burdens – Shifting the Parties’ Burdens – Conclusion

Warenkorb

Ihr Warenkorb ist leer.